As stated before
in the blog on the Noorderplantsoen, story-telling is an important part of
touristic experiences. Not only the fact that it contributes to the
construction of someones social identity makes research of narratives
interesting, also the question how the telling of a story changes within
different settings provides enough research material.[1]
The Academy Building is an important place for me, as a student. Most of my
lectures are held here as well as important ceremonial occasions. It is not a
tourist place in the sense that you can visit it (while its open for everyone I
have not seen any tourists walking around in the building), but the sight is
very determining for Groningen as a city.
If I would pretend
I am a tourist who enters the building, I would encounter a dignified interior
with high stairs and stained glass windows. This stately look might be
something that impresses me and will lead to an incentive to tell
stories about it. As stated in the article (see footnote), stories of tourist
experiences should have an ‘entertainment value’ (which is less the case when
telling stories about daily-life). The story about the Academy Building might
thus be exaggerated, for example, by saying that the interior would be similar to the
interior of a Royal Palace!
- Tessa
[1]Scott McCabe & Clare Foster, "The Role and Function of Narrative
in Tourist Interaction", Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 4 (2006): 194-215, accessed January 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/jtcc071.0
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten